John P. Rohner - CEO of Intelligentry

Topic: TMDD: John Rohner CEO of Intelligentry.com
Guest: TMDD: John Rohner CEO of Intelligentry.com
Host: Larry Seyer
URL: http://www.themostdangerousdevice.com
Copyright: © Larry Seyer
 

Topics Discussed:

John Rohner is the CEO of Intelligentry. A company that consists of 12 people who research, manage and administrate the "Plasmic Transition Process" patent to various companies who are currently building noble gas engines using this technology.

This patent describes a process for powering an engine consisting of one or more cylinders containing a mixture of inert gases. When these gases are excited using this patented electrical process, the pistons are pushed at a constant rate of speed by the transition of those inert gases into a plasma state.

This process also allows for the gases to fall back into their normal gas state after moving the piston and thus powering the engine with no exhaust and no other combustable fuel.

Very little electrical power is required to convert the gases into the plasma state and because of this, the noble gas engine, specifically Inteligentry's patent of this process, is considered by this radio show to be an over-unity device and so we now welcome John Rohner to The Most Dangerous Device Radio show.

Links:

http://intelligentry.com/

http://www.plasmerg.com/

Quoted from their website:

We are the Plasmic Transition Process (tm)Research, Design and Consulting Engineering company that has the experts and holds the Patents...

Filesize: 27279760
File Type: mp3
Sample Rate: 44100
Stereo/Mono: stereo
Bitrate: 128000
Length: (mm:ss) 28:22

Tags:
  • Noble Gas Engine
  • Plasma Transition Process
  • Joseph Papp
  • The Popper

 

 
You might enjoy:
ad
Rick

For a minute I thought I was listening to Kenny Loggins. Namaste.Sounds Great!

Comments   

 
+1 # Charles Stewart 2012-08-13 10:30
Calling it a nobel gas engine expresses high hopes but it, nevertheless, remains a noble gas engine.

Picky, picky.
 
 
# Webmaster 2012-08-13 19:01
Quoting Charles Stewart:
Calling it a nobel gas engine expresses high hopes but it, nevertheless, remains a noble gas engine.

Picky, picky.


Yes, that IS picky.

What you call a device has nothing to do with it's function (obviously).

A 'Noble' gas is an inert gas. They sit on the far side of the periodic table of the elements.

Because they do not 'react' with other elements, they are called 'noble gases' - and for no other reason.

However 'Noble' or not, it is exciting to know that progress is being made on the production of an engine with so much potential.
 
 
# ffonz 2012-08-13 21:39
Hi Webmaster.....

Could be that Charles might have intended
for you to either
[a]: correct the existing tag - or -
: add a correct version while at the
same time leaving the incorrect version in
place.. because 'nobel' is a very common
spelling error - so if it does get put in
a SE it'd still point to your site anyway.

Maybe like this-??

Tags:
Noble Gas Engine
Nobel Gas Engine
Plasma Transition Process
Joseph Papp
The Popper

Hope this is helpful for you.
 
 
# Webmaster 2012-08-13 22:21
You so so correct.

I had mis-spelled noble as 'nobel' in the original article.

It has been corrected.

Thanks for the tip - and sorry for the misunderstanding.

L
 
 
# mike 2012-08-13 21:45
You'll notice that John Rohner speaks in confusing circles, and uses tangents as his friend when trying to answer questions. He is a scam -- Its his brother Bob thats actually the honest one. But John stabs his brother in the back every chance he gets. John Rohner is a snake. .

Do a little research, you'll find out. Google is your friend.
 
 
# Webmaster 2012-08-13 22:25
Quoting mike:
You'll notice that John Rohner speaks in confusing circles, and uses tangents as his friend when trying to answer questions. He is a scam -- Its his brother Bob thats actually the honest one. But John stabs his brother in the back every chance he gets. John Rohner is a snake. .

Do a little research, you'll find out. Google is your friend.



I have no way of knowing who is a 'snake' or not.

However, for the purposes of this radio show, it is only pertinent that an engine capable of running over 2 years with only a few amps of current is possible.

It is not my purpose to take sides with either John or Bob on who 'owns' the technology.

The fact that there are experimenters with working engines using this technology is enough to show that over-unity is possible.

Thanks for the info - I'll see what I can dig up on Bob Rohner.

Maybe we'll have him on a show in the future.

All the best!

L
 
 
# mike 2012-08-13 23:15
The only reason I posted was that I do not want uninformed folks to fall for this charlatan. Hence the google comment. As for the technology --- NOBODY has a power producing pap engine. The technology is simply NOT there for anyone to own. The concept is there, but a real power producing machine does not exist. So far Bob's excuse is that PAP went to the grave with the Gas mixture that worked well. Bob appears to believe that. But at least he is honest enough not to make pie in the sky pseudo-claims as to entice optimistic/naive investors like John.

To clarify --- they both could be con-men for all I know.

What I do know is that John will be making lots of excuses come December 11, 2012 at the PowerGen conference in Orlando. Thats when he is going to debut his engine --- My prediction --- he will blame not having a power producing prototype on his licensed manufacturer.
 
 
# Webmaster 2012-08-14 01:13
It's fairly easy to hide behind anonymity.

Are you willing to post your real name so that people can see who makes these accusations?

If you are stating that John Rohner is a con artist and and a liar (which it appears that you are from your statements), and if you believe what you are saying to be true, then you need to allow the world to know who makes these statements.

Are you willing to let the world know who 'mike' is?

If you're not willing to state who you are, I will be forced to remove these comments as they are simply 'hearsay'. Anybody can do a Google search and 'prove' anything they want - so that reasoning doesn't absolve you from making these statements.

In the mean time, I will leave this thread here so that people can make a determination for themselves.
 
 
-1 # Webmaster 2012-08-13 22:56
BTW, this brings up an important topic for comment.

It is extremely important that this technology be open sourced. In other words, allow experimenters to develop ways to use this process to power engines that they develop.

It is understandable that they (Intelligentry) would want to patent the process and protect it - but all too often patents are used as 'weapons'.

Without open sourcing this technology, it is completely possible that some international corporation could buy this patent and sit on the technology - forbidding ANYONE to do ANYTHING with the process.

This must be prevented at all costs.
 
 

You might enjoy:
  • Keep the comment relevant to this item and this item only
  • Please don't use comments to plug your website-product or your post will be deleted.

To make a comment, please login by clicking on the facebook or LinkedIn links below.

Login With Facebook

Online Novel